3DMark2001SE memories.

[IndianScout]

[bradpit999]

Yes I remember getting 40 fps in Nature with a GeForce 3. My previous Voodoo 5 wouldn't even run it, due to no hardware T&L I think. But the best thing about 3DMark 2001 - the demo music!

agreed this was the only reason i upgraded from the MX2 to an GF3..................... remember seeing 40fps when they launched the 40.41 drivers

this was real benchmarking!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thi is what we want !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[up_the_ante]

agreed this was the only reason i upgraded from the MX2 to an GF3..................... remember seeing 40fps when they launched the 40.41 drivers

this was real benchmarking!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thi is what we want !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah I remember there was a driver release that resulted in a massive jump in the Nature demo. I can't believe you remember the actual number though you big geek!

But come on, how come no one has concurred that the music was absolutley awesome!

[IndianScout]

I remember wanting a ti500 so bad I could taste it...

[Dutchforce]

I remember wanting a ti500 so bad I could taste it...

Still have a Geforce3 Classic, before the Ti series came out.

[mark_man]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9249196

[Goku]

This is the oldest benchmark i have 530 marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=1214280

[finaltidus]

Hi guys. i don't know if this is a good score for my rig:

I got 57361.

E6750 OC to 3.31ghz
ASUS EN8800GT 256MB
1 gig X2 Ram

For some reason 2001SE detected my CPU as 5.73ghz though..

Pls give some comments..

[IeatNvidiots]

Car high still drops under 60fps...... it seems to give simular results with a64 3400+ 2,4ghz with a x800xt pe vs 3,2ghz quad 1950pro, maybe its just not made to scale that well.

Up to 3dmark05 i still used 01[thumbup]

[Wester547]

Car high still drops under 60fps...... it seems to give simular results with a64 3400+ 2,4ghz with a x800xt pe vs 3,2ghz quad 1950pro, maybe its just not made to scale that well.

Up to 3dmark05 i still used 01[thumbup]

I have a very similar problem and I have an AMD Athlon 64 3800+.... it drops all the way down to 24-26FPS (if not a tad lower) when the car is hit but stays well above 60FPS for the rest of the test. I think it's a driver issue in full. Funny thing is, the issue goes away when I use Software T & L! It only drops to 40FPS then (though the average isn't about 105FPS but closer to 54FPS at that point).

I have a somewhat similar problem to pour over in low detail, but then it's just a quick hiccup (which is dealt away with when Software T & L is used, but again, instead of the average being well above 300FPS [but under 400FPS], it's under 200FPS).

A conundrum.