Mario Kills Tanooki - PETA says

[FoodStampz]

http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/inte...-mario-3d-land


Really? Trying to get the media's attention now. How sad.

[idchoppers]

The game is pretty creative though. I got an LOL out of it.

http://features.peta.org/mario-kills-tanooki/

[Setsuna]

peta also kill more animals than anyone else

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/

[_Cubase_]

peta also kill more animals than anyone else

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/

While I don't really like PETA's methods, that whole website is CRAP.

I mean, lets face the facts here: EVERY (and I mean EVERY) animal welfare institution has mandatory termination procedures in place to cope with the overwhelming number of animals they have to move into shelters which are often over-capacity. If they did their research they would see these statistics are not just prevalent in PETA, but all these institutions (RSPCA, SPCA, etc). It's sad, but its unfortunately their only option. It's not what they want to do, it's what they have to do.

What they try and advocate is more animal adoptions, education for people on the importance of looking after animals and reducing abandonment. This coupled with more funding and awareness so they can provide more shelters for the ever-increasing number of stray and abandoned animals.

At the end of the day, thousands of unclaimed pets need to be put down, because they don't have the capacity to keep taking on animals. And it's actually against the law to have overcrowding of animal enclosures. So before everybody gets up in arms about the putting-down of animals, perhaps the problem is much more deeper than that.

[RainWind]

As long as they keep dressing up hot chicks in nothing, or near nothing, I'm cool with anything they do. Only peta can make furries seem hot.

[EarthAtGates]

While I don't really like PETA's methods, that whole website is CRAP.

I mean, lets face the facts here: EVERY (and I mean EVERY) animal welfare institution has mandatory termination procedures in place to cope with the overwhelming number of animals they have to move into shelters which are often over-capacity. If they did their research they would see these statistics are not just prevalent in PETA, but all these institutions (RSPCA, SPCA, etc). It's sad, but its unfortunately their only option. It's not what they want to do, it's what they have to do.

What they try and advocate is more animal adoptions, education for people on the importance of looking after animals and reducing abandonment. This coupled with more funding and awareness so they can provide more shelters for the ever-increasing number of stray and abandoned animals.

At the end of the day, thousands of unclaimed pets need to be put down, because they don't have the capacity to keep taking on animals. And it's actually against the law to have overcrowding of animal enclosures. So before everybody gets up in arms about the putting-down of animals, perhaps the problem is much more deeper than that.

No ****, but those other organizations don't do it under the guise of "OMG WE HAVE TO SAVE EVERY ANIMAL"

PETA is nothing but scum, they don't like animal testing for diseases.

Hell they don't even want you to own pets. They think that owning animals is wrong.

[_Cubase_]

No ****, but those other organizations don't do it under the guise of "OMG WE HAVE TO SAVE EVERY ANIMAL"

PETA is nothing but scum, they don't like animal testing for diseases.

Hell they don't even want you to own pets. They think that owning animals is wrong.

Look I agree with you. I don't like PETA as much as the next bloke. Never said otherwise.

[office_boy]

No ****, but those other organizations don't do it under the guise of "OMG WE HAVE TO SAVE EVERY ANIMAL"

The worst thing about it is PETA helps fund groups that protest against shelters that euthanize animals that they can't place. Meanwhile PETA does **** all to place the animals they get in their shelters insuring that they have to use the same methods that kill shelters do.

[Setsuna]

While I don't really like PETA's methods, that whole website is CRAP.

I mean, lets face the facts here: EVERY (and I mean EVERY) animal welfare institution has mandatory termination procedures in place to cope with the overwhelming number of animals they have to move into shelters which are often over-capacity. If they did their research they would see these statistics are not just prevalent in PETA, but all these institutions (RSPCA, SPCA, etc). It's sad, but its unfortunately their only option. It's not what they want to do, it's what they have to do.

What they try and advocate is more animal adoptions, education for people on the importance of looking after animals and reducing abandonment. This coupled with more funding and awareness so they can provide more shelters for the ever-increasing number of stray and abandoned animals.

At the end of the day, thousands of unclaimed pets need to be put down, because they don't have the capacity to keep taking on animals. And it's actually against the law to have overcrowding of animal enclosures. So before everybody gets up in arms about the putting-down of animals, perhaps the problem is much more deeper than that.

So I guess 1.86% adoption rate clearly means they are doing their campaign right.

[Gordo]

So I guess 1.86% adoption rate clearly means they are doing their campaign right.

Probably because they prefer to kill the animal rather than allow an 'unsuitable' person to adopt the animal.
Remember, these are the same nutters that released minks in Britain, to decimate the local wildlife population, that 'free' battery hens to be frozen to death, to starve or be eaten alive by predators.
While I'm against animal cruelty, I'm an omnivore who remembers those words by Tennyson - "nature, red in tooth and claw" - nature is a least as cruel as we are.