I'd only trust it on the interstate or long highway. In city driving, I doubt any computer could make it through consistently without a wreck.
I'd only trust it on the interstate or long highway. In city driving, I doubt any computer could make it through consistently without a wreck.
It would probably driver better than most humans.
It's already here...at least in prototype. Google have been working on one, and it's already driven 175,000 miles on the open road with zero accidents. It was featured in the first episode of "Brave New World with Stephen Hawking" (I'm sure you can find a video somewhere).
Last edited by Bungle; 12-07-2011 at 01:33 AM.
With commercially available technology in 2011? Obviously not. With commercially available technology in 2050 (assuming I'm still around)? Sure, why not...
Mind you, I would need a car that was intelligent enough to adapt and overcome busy traffic ways and unpredictable drivers. Current technology can "navigate" roads, but to say they are capable of coherent, humal levels(and idealy better) of comprehention and adaption is a long way off.
Last edited by HomeBrewPCiq; 12-07-2011 at 01:40 AM.
3 kinds of ppl..
those who hate driving..
who who don't mind driving..
and those who love driving..
I would if 100% of other cars on the roads were the same. I think human error is more likely to cause a crash then my Microsoft Car.
I was thinking of terrorists attacking the controlling hub of any sort of AI automobile infrastructure when I mentioned sabotage, but hackers of whatever sort would be a big danger, too.
It might even bring about a new type of crime! Tired of your spouse? Have somebody program a catastrophic fault that just happens to fling the unwanted mates vehicle off a bridge.....
And deletes any evidence just before impact with the ground.....
AI crimes forensics technician. (How would that be, as a job title for a cop?)