Pay more attention to what you read, he said "regardless if it's bad", not "regardless that it's bad"Originally Posted by badboy
Pay more attention to what you read, he said "regardless if it's bad", not "regardless that it's bad"
Big deal. How reliable is the guy who posted the article?
Last edited by badboy; 03-15-2010 at 11:25 PM.
No idea whatsoever, but like said, "2 weeks after 26th" has been going around B3D from the mouths of at least somewhat knowledgeable members for some time already, this gave a meaning for it
Delay is not bad if they iron wrinkles and improve perfomance. Better option than to start selling unfinished card with known issues. [beta]
I hope ATI releases thair revisions abiout this time
There will be OC'd editions, but no refresh 'till H2 like AMD/ATI stated earlier
Drago , I agree with u on that..Better to be more late than bring out a card with issues , no good 4 anyone..
but I hope 4 their sake that this archtitecture is worh how far they might get behind ,also about their new feature sets on it and how many Dev's get on board with them , tesselation ya ,but rest..?
Even if they dropped the NDA, no one would have benchmarks to release
So u saying even favorable reviewers have not recieved cherry picked boards yet ,nah no way..If so Nvidia got real probs..Even if they dropped the NDA, no one would have benchmarks to release
Why are you saying that?, I am pretty sure most review websites have already got their review samplesEven if they dropped the NDA, no one would have benchmarks to release
Edit:
I think it is better that the actual retail availability was pushed back two weeks, this will let everyone think before jumping on the card, if you are actually lucky to jump on one
Last edited by Hannoo; 03-16-2010 at 01:03 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote