Could be, but like Neeyik said, the results do make sense (excluding the multitexturing if nvidia didn't cut the blenders)
It's strange that the only parts that do make sense are the parts which we would already know, as Neeyik showed, there are known parts of GF100 that we can extrapolate on to work out it's performance in certain areas, so it's not difficult for someone else to do those same calculations and use it in a fake.
It's a fake i say, just a well researched one.
That also does nothing to explain the CPU clockspeed discrepancy.
Last edited by icemanchilled; 03-16-2010 at 06:42 PM.